"itschrome" (itschrome)
05/02/2018 at 11:05 • Filed to: None
0
7|
"itschrome" (itschrome)
05/02/2018 at 11:05 • Filed to: None | 0
| 7 |
has 72k on it.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> itschrome
05/02/2018 at 11:16 |
|
I’m gonna say CP buuuuut these might well be future classics so who knows maybe they’re on to something.
razorbeamteam
> itschrome
05/02/2018 at 11:19 |
|
I owned one for two years, and I think that’s a lil steep, but still not a crazy crack pipe. More like a salvia pipe or something, but not crack.
I’d pay that for a clean 242 in a heartbeat tho.
jkm7680
> itschrome
05/02/2018 at 11:22 |
|
CP. I wouldn’t pay more than $2,000 for an old Volvo.
It also looks like it has alloys on the left side and hubcaps on the right side.
unclevanos (Ovaltine Jenkins)
> jkm7680
05/02/2018 at 11:27 |
|
Those are the “turbo” style hubcaps for the 240.
|
unclevanos (Ovaltine Jenkins)
> itschrome
05/02/2018 at 11:30 |
|
CP, I barely made a profit for the rusty volvo 240 I sold with a friend. It had the m47 manual. at that price you can get a really good c4 corvette.
OmerCarrothers333
> itschrome
05/02/2018 at 11:43 |
|
If it was $3k-$5k, I would say do-able; over $5k and it’s a CP.
I was going to go on a longer rant about how much of a pain cars from the 70s and 80s are to work on, but I won’t.
gmctavish needs more space
> itschrome
05/02/2018 at 12:14 |
|
CP for a regular 240, still more than I would pay if it was a turbo and/or a 242 in similar condition, but probably wouldn’t be CP.